Thursday, August 21, 2025

On why you should buy the 1963 breviary reprint

As many of us are now waiting with eager anticipation for the arrival of the reprint of the 1963 Monastic Breviary from Editions Pax inter spinas (Monastère Saint-Benoît de Brignoles), I thought I might provide a few brief notes over the next week or so, to help get those new to the breviary oriented, as well as a few pointers on how to say Matins, for those intending to say Matins for the first time.

Before I do that though, I thought I should perhaps provide a few reasons for you to consider buying one if you haven't already put in your order, since the special discount offered on pre-ordering them runs out at the end of this month!

Why a breviary?

Most laypeople saying the Benedictine Office are probably currently using the Latin-English Monastic Diurnal published by St Michael's Abbey (Farnborough).  It's an excellent book that meets the needs of most laypeople.

The idea of a Latin only Breviary might also be off-putting to some, but even if you haven't picked up a fair amount of Latin by immersion in your Diurnal (which you should have, turn your eyes over to the other side of that page!), these days its pretty easy to use a phone ap to help you navigate a book in another language, and to find good translations sources online for the texts you come across in it.

The key reason for many people to consider a breviary is because they want to be able to say Matins.

But even if you have no intention of saying Matins, and are going to continue to use the Diurnal (and/or other English books), subject to your budget constraints, I'd strongly recommend at least thinking about  acquiring the breviary as well.

First, though, it is worth noting that the key differences between the Diurnal and the 1963 Breviary are:

  • the Diurnal only provides the day hours (Lauds to Compline), while the breviary also includes the Night Office, Matins;
  • the breviary includes assorted supplementary material missing from the Diurnal such as the rubrics and the capitular office;
  • this particular reprint also offers another bonus in the form of a supplement containing feasts and other days, essentially those feasts and days contained in the 1934 Antiphonale but omitted in the 1963 Office;
  • it comes in two volumes rather than one.

So why buy it? 1930 vs 1963

Until this reprint, 1963 breviaries have been as rare as hen's teeth (and 1953 versions are similar scarce), and when they do come up for sale, are priced accordingly!

This reprint should make the 1963 breviary, which as far as I can find remains the official set of default books for the Benedictine Confederation (not that you'd know it!), notwithstanding the permissions for monasteries to construct their own versions within the official guidelines, much more accessible.

In particular, I know of several monasteries that have adopted the 1930 breviary for want of other books.  

But the 1930 is problematic for several reasons, not least because several feasts were added to the Benedictine calendar in the years immediately after it was published, so that it doesn't, in fact, match up well to the Antiphonale Monasticum.

The new edition essentially solves that problem first in making the 1963 books available, but also by including a supplement so that those who want to say some of the older feasts and octaves can easily do so.

Those saying Matins

The most obvious reason to buy the breviary is for those who want to add Matins to their prayer schedule, as it provides all of the necessary texts in one place.  

Currently those looking to say Matins have three main options - the English only Monastic Breviary Matins; the Le Barroux Nocturnale; or one of the earlier breviaries.

The Le Barroux version is the closest, but none of these books entirely match the 1963 calendar and rubrics.  And this edition offers an advantage over the Nocturnale in its inclusion of selected earlier feasts.  So even if you plan on continuing to use these books, it is worth having the 1963 breviary as a reference document. 

As an aid to the day hours

Even if you are just planning to stick to the day hours though, you might want to consider the value of having the breviary as a reference document.

The Magnificat antiphon at Vespers on most Saturdays during the year for example, typically refers to the first Nocturn readings at Matins the following day.  So looking up the breviary to see what that reading actually is can help you understand the context for it (and you can always look up the reading in English once you know what book of the Bible and verses it is referring to).

Similarly, the Lauds and Vespers antiphons on Sunday (or on major feasts) typically refer to the Gospel read that Sunday (or feast).  It's usually the same as the reading at Mass in the Extraordinary Form, but if you aren't attending that Mass, its useful to be able to find the relevant Gospel and read it to remind yourself of the context.

If the day is the feast of a particular saint, you might want to take a look at the reading or readings on their life that are said at Matins (some of which help you to decrypt the antiphons said at the day hours!).

A source for the psalms

It is also, I think, useful for those who only say the day hours to at least be able to see the remaining psalms laid out as they are distributed in the Office, exactly as laid out in St Benedict's Rule.

One of the great strengths of the Benedictine Office, in my view, is that it is arranged so that there are often key words, phrases and themes that are recur at different hours on the same day, and so occasionally dipping into look at the 'missing' psalms can enhance your meditation triggered by the Office.

Oblates of monasteries that have eliminated Prime, for example, might find it useful to occasionally take a look at the psalter as St Benedict intended it!

And even if you don't ever intend to say the full monastic Matins, you might want to consider using some of its prayers - the opening prayer of Matins (O Lord open my lips, that I may proclaim your praise) is a great starting prayer for the day, and there are many other treasures you can find in it, such as the first invitatory, Psalm 3, and the short hymn Te Decet Laus used at Sunday Matins, for example.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Using the diurnal with older or newer calendars part 2 - A refresher on feasts

In my last post I noted the differences between the Benedictine and modern sanctoral calendars using the example of August, and suggested some possible approaches to dealing with them, particularly when calendar followed in the Mass you attend differs from that of the Office.  

Today I want to elaborate on that a bit, by way of a brief refresher on how feasts are celebrated in the 1960 rubrics, to aid you in adding extra feasts to the calendar set out in the Monastic Diurnal and Breviary.

Levels of feasts in the 1960 calendar and the precedence of feasts

The first point to note is that although the calendar assigns different levels to each feast, viz Class I, Class II, Class III and Memorials (aka commemorations) the key distinctions between these levels in the Benedictine Office, particularly when it comes to the day hours, is not about how the Office is actually said, but rather which feasts take precedence over others.

That is relevant for adding in new feasts to the older calendar under the terms of the decree Cum Sanctissima, since it means that if there is already a feast set for the relevant day, you can't just override it. 

The Rules about which feasts take precedence are summarised in the Diurnal in the 'two tables', but for practical purposes, the key thing is that even if you can't celebrate a feast in full, you may be able to commemorate the newer feast instead, as the table below illustrates.  

Day level

No/type of commemoration permitted

Class I

Privileged only, 1 commemoration

Class II Sundays

Of a Class I or II feast only, 1 permitted

Class II feasts and days

One privileged and one ordinary

Class III or IV days and feasts

Two commemorations

Privileged commemorations are those of a Sunday, Class I feast, days in octave of Christmas, Sept Ember days, Advent, Lent and Passiontide ferias; privileged commemorations are made at both Lauds and Vespers; ordinary at Lauds only.

So the feast of St Edith Stein, for example, normally falls on the (Class III) Vigil of St Lawrence, so can be commemorated only.

The impact of feasts on the hours

The second point to note is that for the day hours, there is very little difference between celebrating a feast as Class I, Class II, or Class III - the major differences only occur at Matins.

In particular, whether a feast is Class I, II or III makes no difference at all to the way that the hours of Prime to None and Compline are celebrated, except for the use of particular chant tones for things like the hymn.

The key distinction between Class I&II feasts in principle was that Class I feasts have first Vespers, while Class II ones don't, but as most of the traditional monasteries have revived first Vespers for Class II feasts, this distinction is now largely moot.

The table below summarises the impact of the different level of feasts on the hour, in order of least impact to most.  

HOUR

Class I&II feasts

Class III feasts with own antiphons

Class III feasts without proper antiphons

Compline

No effect on texts but can use solemn/festal chant tones for psalms, hymn and Marian antiphon.

Prime

Psalms of the day with antiphon for the feast from the proper of the feast or Common; hymn tone appropriate to the feast level.

Terce to None

Psalms of the day with antiphon from the proper or Common; hymn tone appropriate to the level of the feast.

Lauds

Festal psalms with antiphons and all other variable texts from proper or Common. Canticle antiphon Benedicite*.

Psalms and antiphons of the day, with option of festal canticle; all other variable texts from the proper or Common.

Vespers

Festal psalms with antiphons and all other variable texts from proper or Common.

 

Psalms and antiphons of the day, with option of festal canticle; all other variable texts from the proper or Common.

 *I should also note that when it comes to Lauds, practices around the canticle of the day vary and the rubrics around them are ambiguous!

 Celebrating a feast using Propers and Commons

In terms of the actual texts to use, the general the principle is, where a feast has proper texts, use them, and fill in any gaps from the Common of the appropriate category of saint.

The Commons include standard collects for example, which you can simply insert the name of a saint into, but if your (officially approved) Missal or another Office book provides a specific one for the saint, you can certainly use that instead of the one in the Common.

The same principle applies to all the other variable texts of the hours, and indeed almost every feast in the calendar uses at least some texts from the Commons, while the majority of feasts of all levels do not have proper antiphons, but rather use the Commons.

The key difficulty in finding proper texts that can be used with the 1960 rubrics is that even where the modern Liturgy of the Hours has proper texts, it typically does not include a sufficient antiphons for example.  But in many cases at least some officially approved proper texts for them (including Matins readings) do exist. 

I've previously pointed to the Clear Creek supplements; another source is the (Latin-French) Diurnal Monastique (for Benedictine Congregation feasts in particular); and there are supplements specific to particular congregations or dioceses contained in some editions of the breviary.  Good luck hunting them down though!

Matins

I've left Matins to last, as this is the trickiest.

When it comes to Matins there is really only one key distinction between feast levels, namely those with three nocturns/twelve readings and responsories (Class I&II), and those with two Nocturns (Class III).

Class I&II feasts essentially follow the Sunday model, and always have festal psalms and antiphons (either proper or taken from the Common).

By contrast, the moving parts for Class III feasts are the Invitatory antiphon, hymn, reading(s), responsory or responsories, and collect.

In 'summer' (Easter to the end of October), there is generally only one reading and responsory.  The rest of the year at least one of the three readings of the day is specific to the feast, and there is always at least one (but there can be three) responsories for the feast (either proper to it, or taken from the Common). 

The key challenge is that generally speaking, there does need to be an officially approved reading on the life of the saint.  

Adding back feasts from older calendars that were eliminated in 1960 will shortly become much easier, with the publication of the reprint of the Breviary by Brignoles Monastery, as it includes a supplement for this purpose.

In the case of newer feasts, however, tracking down the necessary reading for the saint is not always easy, particularly as the modern 'Office of Readings' sometimes uses a reading from the saints writings instead.  Applying the normal principle though, you could presumably just use the first Patristic reading from the relevant Common in the absence of anything better...

Friday, August 1, 2025

Can you use the Diurnal with the modern or pre-1960 Roman calendars? A guide to August, Pt 1

There has been some discussion in a number of places recently on using the modern sanctoral Roman calendar (or some variants thereof) in conjunction with the Monastic Diurnal, so I thought I might provide some notes on this topic, as well as the related topic of the pre-1960 Benedictine or Roman calendars, using the month of August as an example.

The Office and the Mass

In essence, the problem is this: in an ideal world, the Office of the day should align with the Mass you attend.  

The Office and the Mass are supposed to reinforce each other, and on saints feasts, for example, at a minimum they will usually share the same collect, and the 'proper' texts (whether from the Common of the relevant type of saint, and/or specific to the feast) typically reflect similar themes. 

But there will always be at least some differences.

You might turn up to daily Mass and find that a Requiem Mass is being said that day for example, or perhaps a votive Mass, instead of the Mass of the day, neither of which have any necessary link to the Office required to be said that day (the Office of the Dead being entirely optional).

Moreover, for many feasts, the impact on the Office at the day hours at least (Matins is a different story, since it will typically contain at least one substantive reading on the saint of the day) is relatively minor.

So its arguably not a big deal if you say the Office of a feast, but the Mass you attend doesn't celebrate it, or vice versa.

Differing calendars

It is also important to be aware that unless you attend daily Mass in a monastery following the 1960 calendar, discrepancies between the calendars of the Office as set out in the Monastic Diurnal and the Mass you attend are inevitable. 

If you attend a Roman Extraordinary Form Mass, you will find it includes several feasts either not included in the Diurnal calendar at all, or in some cases, said on different days. 

And the differences are even greater with the Roman 2025 calendar, which moves many feasts to different days, and adds several new ones.

Possible approaches

Accordingly, it is certainly possible to simply use the Diurnal (or Breviary) and ignore any differences in the feasts celebrated in the Mass that you attend.

If you do want to align calendars between the Mass you attend and the Office that you say however, it really isn't actually that hard to do, and doing so is arguably perfectly consistent with liturgical law.  There are a couple of options you can follow.

Using the modern sanctoral calendar

The first option, which I understand is followed by the Solesmes Congregation traditional monasteries, is to move the sanctoral calendar around so that feasts are said on the same date as they are in current Roman calendar.  

In essence, when the Benedictine Confederation effectively deregulated control of the Office to individual monasteries and/or forced certain monasteries to use something other than the 1962 Mass, it required monasteries to use the Roman sanctoral calendar as it then stood together with a list of supplemental feasts for the Confederation. So, particularly if you are an oblate of one of those monasteries and attend a Novus Ordo Mass, you should ideally say the Office of the saint of the day in the 2025 calendar, not the monastic 1960 one.

Clear Creek Monastery has actually published two supplements, one for the Antiphonale (day hours) and one for the Night Office, available through Lulu, to assist this (it is worth noting though, that these books use older terminology for feast levels, and their calendar of saints does not always entirely align with the Roman 2025 one).

But you can get most of the way yourself without these if necessary.

In August, for example, as the table below shows, if you compare the current Roman calendar with the 1960 Benedictine one, there are ten feasts that are said on exactly the same day (highlighted in yellow), so you can just follow the Diurnal for them.

There are also a further five feasts celebrated on a different date (highlighted in green), so simply a matter of looking the saints name up in the index of saints names in the Diurnal, and using the texts on the appropriate date.

The 2025 calendar also contains several saints canonised since 1960 (highlighted in blue), most notably SS Peter Eymard (canonised 1962); St Teresa Benedicta (canonised 1998); and St Maximilian Kolbe (canonised 1982).  In these cases, the decree Cum Sanctissima gave permission for their Offices (and Mass) to be said with the 1962 books as Class III feasts.  Simply use the Common for the relevant type of saint - confessor for St Peter Eymard, Virgin martyr for St Teresa Benedicta and so forth.

That then leaves you with nine saints whose feasts were included in the 1962 Roman (EF) calendar, but not in the 1960 monastic one (although in a few cases they were in the 1953 and earlier calendars), highlighted in orange.  In some, but by no means all, cases the Solesmes Congregation has included these and you can find the necessary texts in the Supplements, use the Commons, or use an EF 1962 Office book to provide the necessary texts.

Adding feasts to the 1960 calendar

The other (and rather simpler) approach you can take is, consistent with Cum Sanctissima, simply to add any 'missing' feasts - newer or older (see purple highlighted) to the calendar set out in the Diurnal, and use normal principles where clashes occur.  If you want to say the Office of the Vigil of  St Lawrence, for example, you could mark the feast of St Teresa Benedicta as a commemoration.  It is not a perfect solution, but will get you 90% of the way...

DAY

ROMAN 2025

Benedictine 1960

Benedictine 1953

1

St Alphonsus Liguori, M, MD [210]

(1960: Aug 2)

The Holy Maccabees, Memorial

St Peter in Chains; coms of St Paul, Maccabees

2

St Eusebius of Vercelli, Opt M (Roman 1962, commemoration; Benedictine 1953, Aug 14)

St Alphonsus Liguori, Memorial

St Alphonsus Liguori; St Stephen

2

St Peter Julian Eymard, opt m

 

 

3

St Dominic, MD [211] (1960: Aug 4)

 

 

3

St Germanus of Auxerre (Wales)

 

 

4

St John Vianney M (Roman 1962: Aug 8)

St Dominic, Cl 3

St Dominic

5

The Dedication of the Basilica of St Mary Major, MD [211 – Our Lady of the Snow]

Dedication of Our Lady of the Snows, Memorial

Dedication of Our Lady of the Snows

6

The Transfiguration of the Lord, MD [212

The Transfiguration of the Lord, Cl 2

The Transfiguration of the Lord; SS Sixtus II, Felicissimus and Agapitus (1960 – Aug 7)

7

SS Sixtus II & companions, MD [219]

SS Sixtus II, Felicissimus and Agapitus, Memorial

St Cajetan

8

St Cajetan (Roman 1962: Aug 7)

St Cyriacus

St Cyriacus

8

St Mary of the Cross, F (Aust)

 

 

9

St Teresa Benedicta of the Cross

Vigil of St Lawrence, Cl 3

Vigil

10

St Lawrence, F, MD [220]

St Lawrence, Cl 2

St Lawrence

11

St Clare, M, MD [228] (1960: Aug 12)

St Tibertius, Memorial

St Tibertius and Susannah

12

St Jane Frances de Chantal (1960 Roman: Aug 21)

 St Clare

St Clare

13

SS Pontian and Hippolytus, MD [228]

SS Pontian and Hippolytus

SS Pontian and Hippolytus

 

St Fachtna (Ireland)

 

 

 

St Radegunde (France)

 

 

14

St Maximilian Kolbe, M

Vigil of the Assumption, cl 2

Vigil; St Eusebius

15

Assumption of the BVM, S. MD [230]

Assumption of the BVM

Assumption of the BVM

16

St Stephen of Hungary (Roman 1962: Sept 1)

 

Octave of Assumption

17

 

 

Octave, St Lawrence

18

 

St Agapitus, Memorial

Octave; St Agapitus

19

St John Eudes (Roman 1962)

 

Octave

 

St Bernard Ptolemy

 

 

20

St Bernard, M, MD [245]

St Bernard

Octave; St Bernard

21

St Pius X, M, MD [258] (1960: Sept 3)

St Bernard Ptolemy, Memorial

Octave; St Bernard Ptolemy

22

The Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary, M (Roman 1962: May 31)

St Timothy, Memorial

Octave day, SS Timothy and Symphorianus

23

St Rose of Lima (Roman 1962: Aug 30)

 

Vigil

24

St Bartholomew, F, MD [250]

St Batholomew

St Batholomew

25

St Joseph Calasanz (Roman 1962 : Aug 27)

 


 

St Louis, MD 42**

 

 

26

St Caesarius of Arles, (France)

 

 

27

St Monica, M (Roman 1962: May 4)

 

 

28

St Augustine, M, MD [251]

St Augustine, cl 3

St Augustine

29

The Passion of Saint John the Baptist, M, MD [252 – The Beheading of St John the Baptist]

The Beheading of John the Baptist, Cl 3

Beheading of John the Baptist

30

SS Margaret Clitherow Anne Line and Margaret Ward, martyrs (England)

SS Felix and Adauctus, Memorial

SS Felix and Adauctus

31

St Aidan (England and Ireland)

 

 

(Key: S-Solemnity, broadly equivalent to Class I; F=Feast/Class II; M/OptM = Memorial or Optional Memorial/Class III).

In the next post, I'll provide a few more notes on how to say some of these additional Offices, and I'll consider doing a version of this exercise for all months and providing page numbers and or references to the relevant Common if there is enough interest.  

I understand, though, the Benedictine Confederation are actually considering a revised calendar at the moment, so it may be worth waiting a while to see what emerges...